A press leak is exposed....

TTTTT - Texas divides up into four groups. Non-Texans, 5T Texans, Non-5T Texans, and Texas Christians who allegedly don't lie. Since back in secessionist days 5T has been returning to Texas to regroup in time of trouble. Recent additions to the 5Ts cannot exclude Brittany Spears. A Mississippi born non-Texan, she ingratiated herself to the organization by allegedly answering the question 'When was the last time you actually witnessed anyone in the act of purchasing an Inquirer Magazine?' by taking the following course of action; She had a friend or enemy take her picture in the act of doing the very same, and submitted it to the Inquirer tip-line in a friendly bid to offer them an exclusive, but not neglecting the primary requirement of a 5t, 'Never do anything for free!' She is rumored to have been rewarded by installation among the 5t ranks as an administrator in the offshore Asparagus Spear industry. One can only hope she will neglect to 'show a little leg,' in the press by dropping hints at knowledge of recent events in the industry. In this case stealth.scout has been able to verify that her initials will not be held against her. She has allegedly been instructed to seek overseas venues for 5t meetings, in lieu of traveling to Texas at a time like this. Her induced initiation (formal induction) said to have been a sexual one. Inductions have been noted as requiring certain choices; Election or Initiation; If election, is congress sexual or legislative. If Initiation, is intercourse sexual or social. Questions may linger as to the True Texan status of her inductor, but I think she is safely over the hump, with normal cover ups following any witnesses of diaphragm purchase (5ts hate condoms, although a diaphragm is defined as a barrier method too.) By these presents it might be questionable if President Obama has been inducted as well (himself having been subject to discussion in the matter of the GAO in Texas.) 5ts might have signed him in a tip of the hat to the old Microsoft purchase of Apple to preempt lawsuits about the GUI interface. The only independent evidence I can see is a sniffer program picking up the following fragment of an email; -----begin email----- ...Historically FDR was less than 6' tall (in a wheel chair, disabled by polio in fact.) By inference, his campaign manager excelled historically to get him elected.

Bush 41 was an undeniable Machiavel before he ran. No generation can be educated to the virtues of a WhiteHat Machiavel quickly enough to mitigate the voting effect of the new and ignorant generation. As such, Bush 41's campaign manger started with a deficit of goodwill. By inference, his campaign manager excelled historically to get him elected.

Obama is taller than Hillary Clinton, who had the added disadvantage of being a woman. On balance, he was Black with historic deficit of goodwill. He was not a Machiavel before election in my opinion - to ask that of the first successful Black candidate was asking too much (even God apparently chose not to go that route.) By inference, his campaign manager excelled historically to get him elected.

All successful Governmental executives become Machiavels in office if they are not already corrupted to the values of the system on arrival. To fail in your Machiavellian studies is to fail to execute influence successfully. To call a newcomer virgin, innocent or politically chaste is not pejorative, but (emphasis added) _election_must_surely_be_followed_by_congress,_or_it_is_never_consummated.

To have observed that another antonym of virgin is corrupt implies a discussion of perspective on political activism. There are those who advocate change from without - they usually lack influence or connections and fail. There are those who advocate change from within - they are usually corrupted to the values of the system before understanding it sufficiently to effect improvement. This means that politically, change is hard.

That change is hard by definition is not a bad thing; inertia argues against precipitous decisions. Lax applying liberals can do less harm that way, and close applying liberals are not much impeded. -----end email-----